Sumerianz Journal of Education, Linguistics and Literature
Online ISSN: 2617-1201
Print ISSN: 2617-1732
Quarterly Published (4 Issues Per Year)
Journal Website: https://www.sumerianz.com/?ic=journal-home&journal=33Archive
Volume 8 Issue 4 (2025)
Framing Political Discourse in Post-2003 Iraq of Media Narratives
Authors : Hussam Aldeen Nidhal Hadi
DOI : doi.org/10.47752/sjell.84.31.39
Abstract:This study deploys Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and framing theory to investigate how meaning is constructed in presidential speeches news media social media and militant messaging drawing upon a corpus of fifty presidential addresses supplemented by monitoring reports and extant research. The analysis shows a clear evolution away from the ethno religious authoritarian nationalism of the Ba’thist regime with its closed spaces and framing of internal enemies toward more pluralist democratic formulations in the post-2003 period. Leaders like Jalal Talabani Fuad Masum and Barham Salih slowly reconstructed Iraqi nationalism to embrace ethno-religious diversity integrated Islamic iconography to connect with faith based citizens and adapted their discourse in response to evolving national concerns from democratic consolidation to counterterrorism reform from regional diplomacy. With these developments the discourse increasingly becomes peppered with tensions. Sectarian and identity based mobilization continues to emerge as political groups prepare for the 2025 parliamentary elections with monitoring organizations witnessing increased exclusionary rhetoric. The proliferation of traditional and digital media created a more diverse public sphere but also a more fractured one where misinformation can spread exponentially and trust in institutions has withered. Armed groups utilize complex communication methods to legitimize their positions and external actors particularly Iran exert influence via hard and soft power. In this contested context Iraqi political communication becomes a competitive field where state and non state actors traditional and digital media as well as sectarian and cross sectarian imaginaries compete for discursive supremacy. The findings echo previous arguments that processes of “desectarianization” operate within a context of continued access to identity based mobilization particularly in electoral cycles. The study suggests that implementing electoral codes for incitement regulating digital platforms supporting media literacy and independent journalism and fostering cross sectarian dialogue should be on agenda.

